The appeal was dismissed as it was withdrawn by the appellant after the parties amicably settled the dispute. The associated interim application was disposed of as futile.
None; Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; Interim Application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neeta Sawant 1/2 86-AO-289-2023.doc 6 September 2023.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 289 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3678 OF 2023
Sangeeta Vishal Khedekar nee ...Appellant Sangeeta Name Tak V/s. Manojkumar Name Tak and ..Respondent Ors.
Ms. Suvarna Telgote, for the Appellant.
Mr. Amol Dhumal h/f. Mr. Vijay Kokitkar, for Respondent No.1. Mr. Ausgre Carvalho, for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Dated : 6 September 2023.
P.C. :
Neeta Sawant 2/2 86-AO-289-2023.doc 6 September 2023.
for withdrawal of the Appeal. The Appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn .
NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT
Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. Date: 2023.09.08 10:39:26 +0530
Sangeeta Vishal Khedekar nee ... Sangeeta Name Tak
Manojkumar Name Tak
SANDEEP V. MARNE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
