An interim application seeking leave to amend the grounds in a pending public interest litigation was allowed, and the application was disposed of.
Interim application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
63-IA-3466-2023.odt
Rane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3466 OF 2023
IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 1 OF 2022
Santosh Shankar Musale
.....Petitioner
V/s.
State of Maharastra
.....Respondent
Mr. I.M. Khairdi, Advocate for the petitioner.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, ACTING CJ & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE : 13th APRIL, 2023.
P.C. :
3. Interim Application stands disposed of.
NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT
Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2023.04.18 16:46:31 +0530
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
Santosh Shankar Musale
State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
