The interim application, not pressed by the applicant following a prior order, was disposed of without any order passing or relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-AS:33972
41 IA-3466-2022.doc
Harish
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3466 OF 2022 WITH
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.245 OF 2017
Manohar Balbhim Kulkarni ...Applicant In the matter of Manohar Balbhim Kulkarni ...Applicant Versus Malati Padmakar Hinge ...Respondent
Ms. Anjali S. Shinde h/f Ms. Nitin P. Deshpande for the Applicant. Mr. Shailendra S. Kanetkar for the Respondent.
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 6, 2023
P. C. :
1. In view of the order dated 27th September, 2023, the Applicant is
not pressing the Interim Application.
2. Interim Application is disposed of.
(SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. )
1
Manohar Balbhim Kulkarni
Malati Padmakar Hinge
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
