This judgment disposes of an interim application seeking condonation of a 254-day delay in filing a Criminal Appeal. The bench allowed the application and condoned the delay.
The delay of 254 days in filing the Criminal Appeal was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NISHA Digitally signed byNISHA SANDEEP SANDEEP CHITNIS Date: 2023.10.26 CHITNIS 14:39:16 +0530
9-ia.3403.2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3403 OF 2023 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL (STAMP) NO.17622 OF 2023
Surendra Laxman Kadam ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Rahul S. Arote, for the Applicant. Mrs. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent No.1– State. Mr. Pankaj Kavare a/w Mr. Abhishek Satpute, for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & GAURI GODSE, JJ. DATE : 25th OCTOBER 2023
P.C. :
delay of 254 days caused in filing the aforesaid Criminal Appeal.
allowed and delay of 254 days caused in filing the aforesaid Criminal Appeal, is condoned.
GAURI GODSE, J.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
1/1
N. S. Chitnis
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 254 days in filing the Criminal Appeal should be condoned.
Surendra Laxman Kadam
State of Maharashtra
REVATI MOHITE DERE
GAURI GODSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
