Allowed
Vinay Krishnappa Uchil v. Premlata Krishnappa Uchil (Deceased)
Bombay HCIA/3270/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
909-ia-3270-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3270 OF 2021
IN
PETITION NO. 144 OF 2018
Premlata Krishnappa Uchil ...Deceased Vinay Krishnappa Uchil ...Petitioner
Ms. Nidhi G. Dotiya for Applicant.
--CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 5th April, 2023
P.C. :
Testamentary Petition No.144 of 2018.
Probate that the Applicant became aware of certain other properties and securities standing in the name of the deceased. Additionally, it is submitted that
the certain properties of the husband of the deceased which had been bequeathed to the deceased, therefore, the same are not included in Schedule-I.
It is thus that the present Interim Application has been filed for amendment to
Schedule-I.
A.B.Kakde
1/2
909-ia-3270-2021.doc
Interim Application and find that there is no impediment in granting the same.
The said Interim Application is therefore allowed in terms of prayer clause (a)
which reads as under:-
“That the Applicant/Original Petitioner be permitted to amend as per the Exhibit “B” annexed to Interim Application in Schedule I of the Original Petition.”
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
A.B.Kakde
2/2
VINAY KRISHNAPPA UCHIL
PREMLATA KRISHNAPPA UCHIL
A. B. KAKDE
ARIF S. DOCTOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court