This interim application sought condonation of a delay of 889 days in filing Criminal Appeal (ST) No. 16717 of 2023. The Court allowed the application, condoning the delay, and disposed of the matter.
The delay of 889 days in filing the appeal was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-AS:26746-DB
15a. IA 3260-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3260 OF 2023
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 16717 OF 2023
Nailesh Mukesh Patel...Applicant
Versus
The U.T. of Dadra & Nagar Haveli & Anr....Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Mr. K.V.Saste, A.P.P for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
GAURI GODSE, JJ.
DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2023
P.C.:
1.Perused the papers. By this application, the applicant seeks
condonation of delay of 889 days, caused in filing the aforesaid
appeal.
2.For the reasons set out in the application, the application is
Wakodikar
1/2
15a. IA 3260-2023.doc
allowed and the delay of 889 days, caused in filing the aforesaid
appeal, is condoned.
4.Accordingly, the application is disposed of.
GAURI GODSE, J.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
2/2
Wakodikar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay is permissible for filing an appeal after 889 days.
Nailesh Mukesh Patel
The U.T. of Dadra & Nagar Haveli
REVATI MOHITE DERE
GAURI GODSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court