In an interim application, the High Court of Bombay condoned a delay of 105 days caused by the applicant in filing a criminal appeal, allowing the application.
Application is allowed and delay is condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8-IA-3259-2023-APEALST-16652-2023.doc
rrpillai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3259 OF 2023
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 16652 OF 2023
Ramesh Satpal Nagpal and Another...Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Others...Respondents
None for the Applicant.
Ms. S. S. Kaushik, APP for the State.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
GAURI GODSE, JJ.
DATE : 12th SEPTEMBER 2023
P. C. :
1. None for the applicant. Perused the application.
2. By this application, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 105 days caused in filing the appeal.
3.The learned counsel for respondent no. 2 opposes the
condonation of delay.
4. For the reasons set out in the application, the application is allowed and delay is condoned.
GAURI GODSE, J.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 105 days in filing the appeal be condoned.
Ramesh Satpal Nagpal and Another
State of Maharashtra and Others
Revati Mohite Dere
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court