Disposed

M/S. Patil and Bhoir Brothers Partnership Firm Thr. Partner Sonu @ Sonya Shankar Patil v. Smt. Manjula Pratapray Vaidya and Ors.

Bombay HC3 May 2023IA/30663/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Registrar disposed of an interim application seeking substitute service of notice. The court observed that affidavits of service were subsequently filed showing due service to the unserved respondents.

What did the court decide?

The Interim Application to serve notice by substitute service is disposed of as the purpose is served due to subsequent affidavits of service filed.

M/S. Patil and Bhoir Brothers Partnership Firm… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.30663 OF 2022 IN

¶4

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.654 OF 2019

¶5

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders	Court’s or Judge’s orders
CORAM :S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL.-II) DATE : 03^rdMay, 2023
Advocate Namita Shirke Present for Applicant i/by Advocate J.J. Thakkar.
This Interim Application filed to serve Notice upon Respondent Nos.3, 5 and 6 by way of substitute service. However, the Advocate for
Applicant has filed Affidavit of Service daed 14/03/2023 and 21/04/2023 which shows that Notice has been duly served upon the unserved
Respondent Nos.3, 5 and 6. As such the purpose of filing of present Interim Application is served and therefore, this Interim Application is disposed of accordingly. sd/- Registrar (Judl. - II) dsm

M/S. Patil and Bhoir Brothers Partnership Firm Thr. Partner Sonu @ Sonya Shankar Patil v. Smt. Manjula Pratapray Vaidya and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Patil and Bhoir Brothers Partnership Firm Thr. Partner Sonu @ Sonya Shankar Patil v. Smt. Manjula Pratapray Vaidya and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai Vs E.S.I. Corporation and Anr.

Mr. Ravikumar Bhnudas Janbhale vs Mr. Hemant Rajaram Pawar

Kisan Mouldings Limited Vs M/S. Pee Cee Traders and Ors.

Arun Furtado and Ors. Vs Bramhacorp Limited, Thr. Authorised Director Mr. Ajay Ramkumar Agarwal Thr. Poa. a.M.Rege and Ors.

Jayashree Amar Panjwani vs Prakash Gulabmal Sundrani and Ors.

The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Bombay and Anr. Vs Hindustan Lever Limited