Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd., Mumbai v. Poonam Maruti Sasne Thr.Its Natural Guardian Ganesh Dattatraya Harihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In two interim applications, the Bombay High Court confirmed an injunction requiring an insurance company to retain deposited decretal amount pending appeal, while permitting 50% withdrawal for the claimant's education subject to an undertaking to return the sum if the appeal fails, and directing investment of the balance in fixed deposits.
What did the court decide?
50% of the deposited decretal amount is allowed to be withdrawn by furnishing an undertaking to return the amount with interest if the appeal fails; the balance is to be invested in fixed deposits.