The Bombay High Court allowed an interim application for restoration of a writ petition that had been previously dismissed for want of prosecution.
Petition restored to file; interim application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed LAXMIKANT by LAXMIKANT GOPAL GOPAL CHANDAN CHANDAN Date: 2023.11.09 10:28:25 +0530
1 (53) IA-3040.20.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3040 OF 2020 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.243 OF 2013
Shri (Prop.) Janardan Nivrutti Nagane : Applicant/Petitioner In the matter between Shri (Prop.) Janardan Nivrutti Nagane : Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. : Respondents.
Mr. Machhindra A Patil for the Applicant/Petitioner. Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Addl.GP a/w Mrs. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for Respondent-State.
Mr. S. S. Modak i/by Mr. Vijay Killedar for Respondent Nos.2 to 5.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 08th NOVEMBER, 2023
P.C. :
for restoration of the present Writ Petition which has stood
dismissed for want on prosecution on 3rd February 2020.
1 of 2
LGC
2 (53) IA-3040.20.doc
same is allowed. The Petition is restored to file.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
2 of 2
LGC
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the firm application for restoration of the writ petition should be allowed given previous dismissal for want of prosecution.
Shri (Prop.) Janardan Nivrutti Nagane
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent Nos.2 to 5
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA
ARIF S. DOCTOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
