In this interim application, the Bombay High Court allowed the transposition of appellant No. 3 as respondent No. 3 and permitted her to withdraw from the second appeal upon respondents' consent.
Transposition allowed; Amended within two weeks; No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
44.IA.2023.2022.doc
Harish
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2023 OF 2022 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.286 OF 2022
Dr. Chandrashekhar Vishwanath Pethe IN THE MATTER BETWEEN 1. Shri. Vishwanath Balwantrao Pethe Deceased (Legal heirs) 1A. Shivangi Vishwanath Pethe & Ors. ...Applicants Versus 1. Shri. Nivrutti Muralidhar Maule & Anr. …Respondents
Ms. Gunjan Shan i/b Mr. K. P. Shah, for the Applicants.
Ms. Pallavi N. Dabholkar, for the Respondents.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 12th JUNE, 2023
P.C.:
Appellant No. 3-Smt. Shailaja Madhav Oak as Respondent No. 3.
1
44.IA.2023.2022.doc
clauses (a) and (b). Amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks from today.
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)
2
Dr. Chandrashekhar Vishwanath Pethe (Legal heirs of Deceased)
Shailaja Madhav Oak
Nivrutti Muralidhar Maule & Anr.
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
