Allowed

Sangharsh Samiti, ( Group Fighting for Liquor-Free Kharghar) Thru Its Members v. the Commissioner State Excise

Bombay HC6 Jan 2023IA/20144/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the interim application for restoration of the writ petition that was previously dismissed for non-removal of office objections, conditioning it on the removal of objections within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Interim application allowed conditionally on removal of office objections within four weeks; interim application disposed of.

Sangharsh Samiti, ( Group Fighting for Liquor-Free… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

19-IA.20144.2022

¶2

jvs

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 20144 OF 2022 IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 28274 OF 2018

¶6

Sangharsh Samiti and Ors. In the matter between	} Applicant
Sangharsh Samiti and Ors. Versus	} Petitioner
The Commissioner, State Excise	}
and Ors.	} Respondents

¶7

Mr. Ajinkya M. Udane for the applicant.

¶8

Mr. P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader with Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for respondents 1 to 3 (State).

¶9

CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, Act.CJ.& SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

¶10

DATE: JANUARY 6, 2023

¶11

P.C.:

¶12

1. The present application is filed for restoration of the writ petition, which was dismissed for non-removal of office objections.

¶13

2. In the writ petition, notices were also not issued. The learned AGP appears for respondents 1 to 3.

¶14

SALUNKE J V

¶15

3. For the reasons stated in the interim application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) on condition that the objections are removed within four weeks from today. 4. The interim application is disposed of.

¶16

Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2023.01.07 11:28:09 +0530

¶17

(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶18

Sangharsh Samiti, ( Group Fighting for Liquor-Free Kharghar) Thru Its Members v. the Commissioner State Excise

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sangharsh Samiti, ( Group Fighting for Liquor-Free Kharghar) Thru Its Members v. the Commissioner State Excise

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Cdr. Ashok G. Gandhi Vs Union of India and Ors.

Nitin Pandurang Shejwal Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Ors.

Amit Harishchandra Daphal Vs the Superintendent of Police Raigad and Anr.

M.U. Shiva and Ors. Vs Bombay Muncipal Corpn.

Nishika Roadlines Pvt. Ltd. Vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. through the Deputy Genergal Manager and 2 Ors.

Smt. Padmini Baloji Karbhari Vs Uco Bank and Anr.