The court disposed of an interim application seeking clarification regarding a previous order in a writ petition. The application was rejected without granting relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(14)IA-19094-2022.doc
rajshree
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.19094 OF 2022
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.140 OF 2022
Sandeep s/o Gopal Kedia ] .. Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ] .. Respondents
Mr.Upadhyay i/b Mr.Saraogi for the Applicant. Ms.Charu Budhadev i/b Solicis Lex for Respondents. Mr.P.P. Pujari, APP for the State.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J DATE : 6th JANUARY, 2023.
P.C.
1] The present Interim Application is taken out seeking clarification of the order dated 08.07.2022 passed in Writ Petition No.140 of 2022.
2] The learned counsel for the Applicant state that the Application is filed in the wake of fact that this court has reserved liberty in the Petitioner to assail the order passed in Writ Petition if the situation arise and had directed that Review Petition to be decided and execution proceedings initiated against the Petitioner be stayed.
3] I do not think that on the given ground, relief which is sought in the Interim Application can be granted.
1/2
(14)IA-19094-2022.doc
But needless to state that, if the Review Petition was not pressed, the Applicant is at liberty to take such steps as are advisable in law.
With the above observations, Interim Application is disposed off.
[BHARATI DANGRE, J]
2/2
Sandeep s/o Gopal Kedia
State of Maharashtra
Anr.
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
