Disposed

Nirmala (Niru) Subhash Sharma v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC21 Dec 2023IA/1863/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed an interim application by the husband (who was the applicant in the interim application) to withdraw Rs. 8,00,000 deposited by him earlier under a maintenance order in Domestic Violence proceedings. The Criminal Writ Petition was adjourned.

What did the court decide?

Allowed the withdrawal of Rs. 8,00,000 along with accrued interest deposited earlier.

Nirmala (Niru) Subhash Sharma Vs State of Maharashtra… — Maintenance and Alimony | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

18-Cri-WP-1019-2023.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1019 OF 2023

¶4

Subhas M. Sharma … Petitioner

¶5

V/s.

¶6

State of Maharashtra and Anr … Respondents

¶7

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1863 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1019 OF 2023

¶8

Nirmala (Niru) Subhas Sharma … Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra and Anr … Respondents

¶9

Mr. Amit Dubey i/b Mr. Ashok Sarogi, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Krupali Rajani, Advocate for Respondent No.2 & for Applicant in IA/1863/2023.

¶10

Mrs. M. R. Tidke – APP for the Respondent-State.

¶11

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : 21 DECEMBER 2023

¶12

P.C.:

¶13

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1863 OF 2023

¶14

This Interim Application is filed by husband challenging an order of interim maintenance passed under the D.V. proceedings.

¶15

By an order dated 21 March 2023 this Court directed the petitioner to deposit part of the arrears of interim maintenance,

¶16

¶17

Sharada

¶18

18-Cri-WP-1019-2023.doc

¶19

i.e. Rs. 8,00,000/-.

¶20

Both the counsel submit that the Applicant had already complied to the said direction and deposited a sum of Rs.8,00,000/- before this Court.

¶21

The Respondent No.2 (wife) has now preferred an Interim Application no.1863 of 2023 for seeking permission to withdraw the amount of Rs.8,00,000/- deposited by the Applicant in this Court.

¶22

Heard. I have gone through the interim application taking into considering the facts as mentioned in the interim application. I am satisfied that the case is made out to allow this interim application.

¶23

Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Applicant (Nirmala Subhas Sharma) is allowed to withdraw a sum of Rs.8,00,000/- along with accrued interest from this Court.

¶24

Interim Application stands disposed of.

¶25

All the parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order.

¶26

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1019 OF 2023

¶27

Stand over to 8 January, 2024. Ad-interim relief, if any, to continue till then.

¶28

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)

¶29

¶30

Sharada

Nirmala (Niru) Subhash Sharma v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nirmala (Niru) Subhash Sharma v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Sudam Mhasku Gaikwad( Since Decd. Thr. Lrs) Phulabai Sudam Gaikwad and Ors. Vs Shri Shankar Mhasku Gaikwad (Deceased Thr. L/H.) 1A Smt. Tanuhubai Shankar Gaikwad and Ors.

Shashikant Appa Kadu Vs Appa Babla Kadu

Sudam Mhasku Gaikwad Deceased Vs Shankar Mhasku Gaikwad Deceassed

Gaurav Bhandari and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Suhas Sudhakar Phansalkar vs Vaidehi Suhas Phansalkar

Gurmeet Singh Dhody vs Rita Gurmeet Dhody