The High Court of Bombay disposed of an interim application filed in a Public Interest Litigation, noting that the notice for the Tahsildar would be withdrawn, rendering the interim application devoid of purpose.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
44.186.23-ia.docx
Digitally signed byTRUSHA TRUSHA TUSHAR TUSHAR MOHITE MOHITE Date:2023.01.16 11:33:19 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.186 OF 2023 IN
SUO MOTU PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 2 OF 2022
Dashrath Sukarya Lokhande ….. Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN High Court on its own motion ….. Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….. Respondents
Mr.Kranti L.C. i/b Mr.Kaustubh Gidh for the Applicant
Mr.P.P.Kakade, G.P. a/w Mr.M.M.Pabale, A.G.P. for the State
Mr.Ashutosh M. Kulkarni, Amicus Curie
Mr.Ajinkya Udane i/b Mr.Asim Sarode for the Applicant in Interim Application No.22415/2022
CORAM: S.V.GANGAPURWALA, ACJ & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED : JANUARY 13, 2023
P.C.
G.P. for the Respondent.
the Tahsildar would withdraw the notice (page 13).
1/2
Mohite
44.186.23-ia.docx
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J)
(ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
2/2
Mohite
Dashrath Sukarya Lokhande
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
