This interim application challenging the order of the competent authority was disposed of. The court directed the applicant to file a substantial writ petition.
Interim application disposed. Liberty granted to file substantial writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17674 OF 2022 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 646 OF 2022
Balasaheb Genaba Kingare ...Applicant. Versus Municipal Commissioner ..Respondent.
..Respondent.
Mr. Balasaheb G. Kingare, the Applicant-in-person.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : July 21, 2023.
P. C. :
Patil-SR
Digitally signed SACHIN by SACHINRAMCHANDRAPATIL 1 of 2 RAMCHANDRA PATIL Date: 2023.07.25 11:09:17 +0530
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
2 of 2
Patil-SR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to the levy of interim application in respect of the challenged order passed by the competent authority.
Balasaheb Genaba Kingare
Municipal Commissioner
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
