In an interim application, the court allowed the petitioner to be heard on filing a praecipe dated 23.02.2023 and ordered that office objections be removed within one week to restore the writ petition dismissed for non-removal.
Office objections to be removed within one week; interim application allowed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
p1. ia 1766-23.doc
R.M. AMBERKAR
(Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1766 OF 2023
IN
WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 12585 OF 2021
Subhash Dattu Gaikwad
Applicant /
.. Petitioner
Versus
Sharad Sadanand Jadhav & Ors. .. Respondents
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 23, 2023
P.C.:
1. Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.
2. Heard Mr. Thorat, learned Advocate for Petitioner. Perused the praecipe dated 23.02.2023.
3. The present Interim Application is taken out for setting aside the order dated 28.11.2022 passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial-I) and restoration of Writ Petition (St) No. 12585 of 2021 which came to be dismissed for non-removal of the office objection.
4. Perused the Interim Application. For the reasons stated in paragraph No. 6 therein, Interim Application is allowed and disposed of in terms of payer clauses (a) and (b).
5. Let the office objections be removed within one week from today.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally signed by RAVINDRA RAVINDRAMOHANAMBERKAR MOHANAMBERKARDate:2023.02.23 15:17:40 +0530
1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order of non-removal of office objection should be set aside?
Whether the writ petition should be restored for removing office objections?
Subhash Dattu Gaikwad
Sharad Sadanand Jadhav & Ors.
MILIND N. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
