Disposed

Navnath Dattatray Lokhande and Another v. Mahadu Hari Alandkar (Deceased) Thr. His Lrs. and Others

Bombay HC8 Nov 2023IA/1733/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay disposed of two appeals and interim applications after receiving signed Consent Terms submitted by party advocates, which resolved disputes amenable between the parties.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order is modified to reflect the terms of the Consent Terms; appeals and interim applications are disposed of.

Navnath Dattatray Lokhande and Another Vs Mahadu… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

k 1/2 906 ao 327.22 as.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.327 OF 2022

¶4

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2302 OF 2022 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.327 OF 2022

¶5

Mahadu Hari Alandkar since deceased through LHs ....Appellants/Applicants V/S Kisabai Ganpat Alandkar since deceased & Ors. . ....Respondents

¶6

....Appellants/Applicants

¶7

WITH APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.250 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1733 OF 2022 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.250 OF 2022

¶8

Navnath Dattatray Lokhande & Anr. ....Appellants/Applicants V/S

¶9

Mahadu Hari Alandkar deceased through His LRs & Ors. ....Respondents

¶10

Mr. Sumit S. Kothari, for the Appellants/Applicants in AO 327 of 2022 and for the Respondents in AO 250 of 2022.

¶11

Mr. Chaitanya B. Nikte, for the Appellants/Applicants in AO 250 of 2022 and for the Respondents in AO 327 of 2022.

¶12

CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 08, 2023.

¶13

1/2

¶14

katkam

¶15

k 2/2 906 ao 327.22 as.doc

¶16

P.C.:

¶17

1 Mr. Kothari and Mr. Nikte, the learned Advocates appearing for contesting parties would jointly submit that the parties have amicably resolved disputes amongst them and that they have signed and executed the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms which are tendered before the Court are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The Consent Terms are signed by all the parties to the Appeals (except Mr. Navnath Dattatray Lokhande and Mr. Aniket Mahendra Mandhare) who are present before the Court and admit their signatures as well as contents of the Consent Terms. Shri Navnath Dattatray Lokhande and Mr. Aniket Mahendra Mandhare were personally present before the Court yesterday i.e. on 7 November 2023 and have confirmed before the Court having signed the Consent Terms. The learned Advocates appearing for the consenting parties identify the signatures of the contesting parties on the Consent Terms.

¶18

2 Both the Appeals are accordingly disposed of in view of the Consent Terms. The impugned order passed by the Trial Court shall stand modified and instead the arrangement agreed in the Consent Terms would govern the rights and entitlements of the parties. The statements made in the Consent Terms are accepted as Undertakings given to this Court.

¶19

3 In view of the disposal of the Appeals, both the Interim Applications are also disposed of accordingly.

¶20

(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)

¶21

2/2

¶22

katkam

Navnath Dattatray Lokhande and Another v. Mahadu Hari Alandkar (Deceased) Thr. His Lrs. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Navnath Dattatray Lokhande and Another v. Mahadu Hari Alandkar (Deceased) Thr. His Lrs. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sardar Krishan Singh Vs the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation

Jal Vayu Defence Enclave Cooperative Housing Society Vs Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies (Cidco) and Ors.

M/S. Gagan Emarald Co-Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Vs M/S. Gagan Associates and Ors.

Shriram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Phaltan through Its in-Charge Director Vs Kirtikant Shankarrao Wagh

Chetan Virji Dangodara and Others Vs Kanhaiyalal Nathulal Joshi(Deceased)Thr. Lrs.

Navnath Dattatray Lokhande and Another Vs Mahadu Hari Alandkar (Deceased) Thr. His Lrs. and Others