Single judge order in interim application allowing correction of Respondent No.1's name in the appeal memo from 'Rajendra' to 'Rajesh' with no order for costs.
Application allowed to correct the name of Respondent No.1 as 'Rajesh' with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21-ia-172-2023 in sa-218-2022.doc
Pallavi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.172 OF 2023 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.218 OF 2022
Bhailal Danabhai Parmar… Applicant
Versus
Mr. Rajesh Arvind Surti and Ors.… Respondents
Mr. Yogesh Kumar Yadav i/b. Manoj Jaiswal & Associates, for the
Applicant.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 10th JANUARY 2023
P.C.:
1. Interim application is taken out by the Applicant i.e. the
original appellant for rectifying the name of Respondent No.1. It isthe contention of the Applicant that name of Respondent No.1 is
‘Rajesh’ and instead in the Appeal Memo, it has been mentioned as
‘Rajendra’.
2. Therefore, for the reasons set out in the application, applicant
is allowed to correct the name of Respondent No.1 as ‘Rajesh’.
Interim Application is allowed in above terms with no order as to
costs.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow an interim application to correct the name of Respondent No.1 in the appeal memo from 'Rajendra' to 'Rajesh'.
Bhailal Danabhai Parmar
Mr. Rajesh Arvind Surti
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court