Allowed

Patrick Denis Dsouza v. Mariemartha Rathindra Basu (Applicant/Caveator)

Bombay HC26 Jun 2023IA/1626/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an interim application seeking condonation of a 127-day delay in filing an Affidavit-in-support for Caveat No. 33818 of 2022 and directed the registry to accept the document.

What did the court decide?

The Interim Application was allowed; the office was directed to accept and take on record the Affidavit-in-support of Caveat No. 33818 of 2022.

Patrick Denis Dsouza Vs Mariemartha Rathindra… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

12.ia.1626.23.doc

¶2

Ajay

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J.

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1626 OF 2023

¶5

IN

¶6

CAVEAT (L) NO. 33818 OF 2022

¶7

Ms. Monica Alfonsia D’Souza ..Deceased
Patrick Denis D’Souza..Petitioner
 And
Mariemartha Rathindra Basu and Ors.Applicant /
..Caveator

¶8

Mr. Sachin Punde a/w. Mr. Siddharth Wakode, Advocate for Applicant.

¶9

CORAM:MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE:JUNE 26, 2023.

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

1. Heard Mr. Punde, learned Advocate for Applicant.

¶12

2. This Interim Application has been filed for seeking extension

¶13

of time and condonation of delay of 127 days in filing Affidavit-in-

¶14

support of the Caveat.

¶15

3. I have perused the Interim Application.

¶16

4. For the reasons mentioned in the Interim Application,

¶17

Interim Applications is allowed in terms of prayer clauses ‘A’ and ‘B’

¶18

which read thus:-

¶19

 “A) This Honourable Court be pleased to condone the delay of
127 days for filing Affidavit-in-support of the Caveat (L)
No.33818 of 2022 be condoned;

¶20

1 of 2

¶21

12.ia.1626.23.doc

¶22

B) This Honourable Court be pleased to direct the office to
accept and take on record the Affidavit-in-support of Caveat.”

¶23

5. Interim Application is disposed.

¶24

6. Registry is directed to take further steps in accordance with

¶25

law.

¶26

 [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

¶27

Ajay

¶28

2 of 2

Patrick Denis Dsouza v. Mariemartha Rathindra Basu (Applicant/Caveator)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Patrick Denis Dsouza v. Mariemartha Rathindra Basu (Applicant/Caveator)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramod Parshuram Shinde Vs Parshuram R.Shinde and Ors.

Divya Jitendra Sharma Alias Namrat Niranjan Bolakani and Anr. (Caveator) vs Bhagwan Sahijram Motwani (Petitioner)and Jitendra Motilal Sharma (Deceased)

Nandita Ashok Khosla vs Kamli Vishindas Vazirani (Deceased)

Jayasree Ramchandran Nair and Another Vs Kandoth Poyil Ramchandran Nair (Deceased)

Ebrahim Hohd. Hanif Baig Vs Mohd. Hanif Ebrahim Baig and Zarina Hanif Baig (Deceased)

Nilesh Yashwant Ayare vs Harihar Shikshan Sanstha and 3 Others