In an interim application, the High Court of Bombay set aside and allowed amendments within the prayer clauses without providing substantive reasoning.
Amendment permitted within two weeks as per prayer clauses (A) and (B).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
31-ia-16-2022.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 16 OF 2022
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.97080 OF 2020
United India Insurance Co Ltd, Pune ….Applicant/ Appellant
Versus
Devappa Ramanna Koli (Deceased) through legal heirs 1A Muktabai Devappa Koli and ors. ….Respondents
Mr. Amol Gatne, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. Milind V More, Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM : S. G. DIGE, J.
DATE : 23rd FEBRUARY 2023.
P.C. :
counsel for the respondents.
2. Considering the submissions of both learned counsel and
reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (A) and (B) and disposed of.
1/2
Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHUBHADA SHANKARKADAM SHANKAR KADAM Date:2023.02.24 19:27:16 +0530
31-ia-16-2022.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
today.
(S. G. DIGE, J.)
2/2
United India Insurance Co Ltd, Pune
Devappa Ramanna Koli (Deceased) through legal heirs 1A Muktabai Devappa Koli and ors.
S. G. DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
