The High Court of Bombay (Criminal) disposed of an interim application seeking suspension of conviction as withdrawn by the applicant after the judge expressed disinclination to entertain it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(11)IA-1443-2023.doc
rajshree
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1443 of 2023
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.455 of 2020
Vijay Shankar Irmal ] .. Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ] .. Respondents
Mr.Tanvir Shaikh for the Applicant. Mr.S.R. Agarkar, APP for the State.
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J
DATE : 25th April, 2023.
P.C.
2] On expressing my disinclination to entertain the application seeking suspension of conviction, imposed upon the Applicant, by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri in Special Case No.12/2018 on 09.11.2022, the learned counsel for Applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application. Permission is granted.
[BHARATI DANGRE, J]
1/1
Vijay Shankar Irmal
State of Maharashtra
Anr
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
