Disposed

Rajendra Ghai and Anr. v. Svc Co-Op Bank Ltd. and Anr.

Bombay HC28 Mar 2023IA/1430/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition challenging an order under the SARFAESI Act, the Bengaluru High Court held that since the applicants had already approached the Debt Recovery Tribunal and Appellate Tribunal, the writ petition was disposed of as having an alternative remedy.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of by the Court; the interim application was also disposed of.

Rajendra Ghai and Anr. Vs Svc Co-Op Bank Ltd… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2023)

22-wp-8266-2021.doc

Trupti

TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE

¶5

Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2023.03.29 15:35:14 +0530

¶6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 8266 OF 2021 WITH

¶8

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1430 OF 2022

¶9

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO. 8266 OF 2021

¶11

… Mr. Rajendra Ghai and Anr. Petitioners/Applicants vs. … SVC Coop. Bank Ltd. & Anr. Respondents

¶12

None for the Petitioners/ Applicants.

¶13

Mr.Apoorva Kulkarni i/b. M/s.V.Deshpande and Co. for Respondent No.1.

¶14

Ms. Bijal Gogri i/b. GNP Legal for Respondent No.2.

¶15

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.

¶16

DATE : 28 MARCH 2023

¶17

P.C. :-

¶18

None appears for the Petitioners. The Petitioners have challenged the order dated 8 December 2016 passed by the District Magistrate, Thane under section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. It is settled law that as against this order, the parties would have a remedy before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

22-wp-8266-2021.doc

Trupti

The learned Counsel appearing for the respective Respondents point out that the Petitioners have already filed an application before the DRT under section 17 of the SARFAESI Act of 2002. Thereafter, the Petitioners have also filed an appeal in the Appellate Tribunal. In the appeal, the Appellate Tribunal has noted that the parties are trying to resolve the disputes. The learned Counsel appearing for the respective Respondents have placed before us the order dated 18 November 2022 passed in Appeal No. 12 of 2020. Since the Petitioners have an alternate remedy which the Petitioners have already availed of, keeping all contentions of the parties open, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶23

In view of disposal of the writ petition, nothing remains in the interim application and the same is accordingly disposed of.

¶24

ABHAY AHUJA, J.

¶25

NITIN JAMDAR, J.

Rajendra Ghai and Anr. v. Svc Co-Op Bank Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Ghai and Anr. v. Svc Co-Op Bank Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Marble and Tiles Association, Pune Vs the Commissioner,Pune Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Rupesh Nandkumar Nadkar and Anr. Vs Idbi Bank Ltd. and Anr.

Padma Motilal Gadia and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra Thr Government Pleader and Anr.

Rushabh Real Estate Developer Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Pradnya Prakash Humane and Ors. Vs Bank of India and Ors.

The Nashik Merchants Co-Op Bank Ltd. Nashik Thr. Authorised Officer Vs Union of Inida and Anr.