Single judge upheld the condonation of a delay of 653 days in filing a cross objection, allowing and disposing of the interim application.
Condonation of delay of 653 days for filing cross objection; application allowed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8-ia-1223-2023.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1223 OF 2023 IN CROSS OBJECTION STAMP NO. 637 OF 2023 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 963 OF 2018
Sandhya Singh & 2 ors. ...Applicants
versus
Mr. Yogesh Pande, Advocate for for the Applicants. Ms. P. M. Bhansali i/b. G. S. Hegde, Advocate for the Respondent No.1.
Mr. Yuvraj Narvankar, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : S. G. DIGE, J.
DATE : 8th FEBRUARY 2023.
P.C. :
counsel for the respondents.
reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 653 days for filing the cross objection is condoned. The application is allowed and disposed of.
(S. G. DIGE, J.)
1/1
Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHUBHADA SHANKAR SHANKAR KADAM KADAM Date: 2023.02.14 11:05:59 +0530
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 653 days in filing a cross objection is condonable.
Sandhya Singh & 2 ors.
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Thr. Divisional Manager Transport Division
Smt. Manju Singh
S. G. DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
