This interim order allowed an application seeking leave to segregate Applicant-Original Accused No.2's appeal from a larger criminal case and file a separate appeal with new counsel.
Leave to segregate the appeal and file a separate appeal with different counsel granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DAE 26-IA-1165-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1165 OF 2023
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 120 OF 2012
Ashraf Bano Moiddin Bekel ...Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Amit Mane,Advocate for Applicant/Appellant.
Mrs. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for Respondent-State.
Digitally signed by DNYANESHWARASHOK ETHAPE DNYANESHWARASHOK ETHAPEDate: 2023.04.13 10:02:58 +0530
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
PRAKASH D.NAIK, JJ.
DATE : 10th APRIL 2023.
P.C.:-
1. By the present Application, the Applicant-Original Accused No.2 is seeking leave to segregate his Appeal from Appeal No.120 of 2012 and to file a separate and distinct Appeal by appointing another Advocate.
2. In view thereof and for the reasons stated in the Application, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to segregate the appellant's current appeal from Appeal No. 120 of 2012 and file a separate appeal by appointing another advocate should be granted.
Ashraf Bano Moiddin Bekel
The State Of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court