Dismissed

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited through Its Authorised Representatives v. Hri. Birbal Gudadji Survasiya and Anr.

Bombay HC1 Dec 2023FA/717/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court bench dismissed an appeal preferred by an insurance company against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal order. The court held that the insurers failed to examine witnesses to prove the driver did not hold a valid license, and thus no interference was warranted. The appeal was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is dismissed. The respondents are permitted to withdraw the amount deposited by the appellant along with accrued interest.

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited through… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

25-fa-717-2023-Jud.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

FIRST APPEAL NO.717 OF 2023

¶4

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (HUB) } Thr. Its Authorized Representative } Office At Mumbai Annex State Building, } 3^rd Floor, Bank Street, Horniman Circle, } Mumbai-400 001. } ….Appellant

¶5

V/s.

¶6

Digitally signed NILAM by NILAM SANTOSH SANTOSHKAMBLE KAMBLE Date: 2023.12.13 10:20:01 +0530

¶7

Shri.Birbal Gudadji Survasiya } R/at Vatsalatai Naik Nagar, Galli No.1 } Chembur, Hanuman Galli, } Mumbai-400 071. } } 2. Shri.Shrikant B. Paul } R/at Vatsalatai Naik Nagar, Galli No.1 } Chembur, Hanuman Galli, } Mumbai-400 071. }^{….Respondents}

¶8

Mr.Anisha Didwania i/b NDB Law, for the Appellant. Ms.Varsha Chavan, for the Respondent No.1.

¶9

CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

¶10

DATE : 1^st DECEMBER 2023

¶11

JUDGMENT :-

¶12

. The issue involved in this Appeal is that, driver of

¶13

insured vehicle was not holding effective and valid driving license

¶14

at the time of the accident and there was breach of terms and

¶15

N.S. Kamble page 1 of 4

¶16

25-fa-717-2023-Jud.doc

¶17

conditions of the Insurance Policy.

¶18

It is contention of the learned counsel for the

¶19

Appellant that, at the time of the accident, driver of the offending vehicle was not holding effective and valid driving license, but this fact is not considered by the Tribunal. There was breach of Terms and Conditions of Insurance Policy. Hence, pay and recovery order should have been passed by the Tribunal but, it has not been passed. Hence, requested to allow the Appeal.

¶20

It is contention of the learned counsel for the Respondent No.1-Claimant that, Appellant-Insurance Company has not examined any witness to prove that there was breach of Terms and Conditions of the Insurance Policy and driver was not holding any effective and valid license, hence, the order passed by the Tribunal is legal and valid, no interference is required in it.

¶21

I have heard both learned counsel. Perused judgment and order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (‘The Tribunal’ for short), Mumbai.

¶22

The Appellant-Insurance Company has raised the issue that, driver of Insured vehicle was not holding effective and

¶23

N.S. Kamble page 2 of 4

¶24

25-fa-717-2023-Jud.doc

¶25

valid driving license, at the time of the accident. But to prove their contention the Appellant’s have not examined any witness before the Tribunal. Without any evidence, this Court can't consider that the driver was not holding effective and valid driving license while dealing with this issue. The Tribunal has observed that, the witness examined by the Insurer, has admitted in cross-examination that, on the basis of the charge-sheet he has stated that the driver was not holding effective and valid license and he has not served notice on the owner. The Tribunal has observed about not examining the driver by the Appellant and on that basis, order is passed. I do not find any infirmity in it.

¶26

Considering the above reasons, I pass following order.

¶27

ORDER

¶28

(i) The Appeal is dismissed. (ii) The Respondent’s/Claimant’s are permitted to withdraw amount deposited by the AppellantInsurance Company along with accrued interest.

¶29

(iii) The statutory amount alongwith interest be transferred to the Tribunal. The parties are at liberty

¶30

N.S. Kamble page 3 of 4

¶31

25-fa-717-2023-Jud.doc

¶32

to withdraw it as per Rules.

¶33

(iv) All pending Civil and Interim Applications are disposed of.

¶34

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)

¶35

N.S. Kamble page 4 of 4

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited through Its Authorised Representatives v. Hri. Birbal Gudadji Survasiya and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited through Its Authorised Representatives v. Hri. Birbal Gudadji Survasiya and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vaishali Chandrakant Sonar and Anr. Vs the Pune Mun. Transport Corpn. and Anr.

M/S. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Thane Vs Akram Sattar Shaikh and Ors.

Nita Narendra Nadgouda Vs M/S Garuda Carrieres and Shipping (P) Ltd. and Ors.

The New India Assurance Company, Nashk Vs Akhtar Mohammad Shaikh and Ors.

Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. through Its Amol a Bidwai Vs Shantabai Sachin @ Lakhan Wagh and Ors.

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Shri. Arjun Kisan Konde and Ors.