Appeal disposed based on outside settlement via consent terms. Interim application disposed.
The appeal and the pending interim application are disposed of based on the consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 901 fa 614-23 with caf 999-15-c.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO.614 OF 2023
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.999 OF 2015
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.614 OF 2023
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance
Company Limited… Appellant
Vs.
Shyam Anil Mehta and ors.… Respondents
Mr.Rahul Mehta i/by M/s KMC Legal Venture, Advocate for the
Appellant.
Mr.Akshay Patil i/by Mr.Satendra Kumar, Advocates for the Respondents
No.1 and 2.
CORAM :ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE :08 AUGUST, 2023.
P.C.:
1. Learned counsel for the Appellant and Respondents No.1 and 2
tender across the Bar Consent Terms signed by the Appellant-authorized
signatory as well as Respondents No.1 and 2 who are present in court and
submit that the matter is settled between them.
2. The Consent Terms dated 8th August, 2023 are taken on record and
1 of 2
Priya R. Soparkar
2 901 fa 614-23 with caf 999-15-c.doc
marked “X” for the purposes of identification. The undertakings in the
Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings to the court.
3. The Appeal stands disposed in terms of the Consent Terms.
4. The statutory deposit of Rs.25,000/- deposited in this court be
transferred to the concerned Tribunal.
5. Pending Interim Application accordingly stands disposed of.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
2 of 2
Priya R. Soparkar
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited
Shyam Anil Mehta
ABHAY AHUJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court