location of the fracture was at the juncture of the middle and lower 1/3rd.. The claimant had undergone surgery in the year 1994 and in the year 2002 for Osteomyelitis i.e. pus formation. The claimant had also approached this witness on 28 February, 2002 for the disability certificate. This witness examined the claimant clinically and radiologically. Due to complication developed in the right leg, the claimant had deformities. As per the opinion of this witness, the claimant had suffered 87% permanent partial disability. Accordingly, this witness issued a certificate. This witness has further stated that the claimant cannot do any work due the disability. In crossexamination, this witness admitted that the claimant should have been recovered within 3 to 6 weeks but, as pus formation took place, complications developed in right leg, osteomyetlitis is one of the complications. This witness further admitted that the percent of assessment of disabilities varies from surgeon to surgeon by margin of 4 to 5 percent . This witness denied the suggestion that this witness has assessed the permanent partial disability on much higher side without taking into consideration the earlier medical case paper of the claimant. From the evidence of this witness, it appears that the claimant was seriously injured in the accident, at the time of accident, he was working as Mason. He got operated on two
