Appeal dismissed with consent due to non-appearance of the appellant on multiple occasions despite warnings and the disposal of pending related applications.
The appeal is dismissed. Pending Civil / Interim application(s) stand dismissed/disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO.1070 OF 2011
DHANAJI SOPAN BARVE
)...APPELLANT
V/s.
SOPAN LAXMAN BHUJBAL AND ORS. )...RESPONDENTS
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4804 OF 2016 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.1070 OF 2011
None for the Appellant.
Mr.Shubham Sane h/f. Mr.P.G.Sarda, Advocate for the Respondents
No.1 and 2 and for the Applicant in CAF.
CORAM:ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE:12th JULY 2023
P.C. :
1. On 5th July 2023, the following order was passed :
“1. None for the Appellant.
2. On 4th May, 2023 the following order was passed:-
“None present for the Appellant.2. The Appeal is of the year 2011.
3. On the last date also no one is present for the Appellant. It appears from record on three occasions matter was dismissed, thereafter restored.
avk 1/2
3.doc
4. Last chance is given to the Appellant to go on with the matter. Stand over to 5 July 2023. On next date if the Appellant fails to argue the matter, the matter would be dismissed.
5. I make it clear that there is no stay to the proceedings of the execution.”
3. Again today none appears for appellant.
4. List on 12th July, 2023 for dismissal.”
2. Today the matter is listed for dismissal. Again today, none
appears for the Appellant. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed.
Pending Civil / Interim application(s) if any, also stand dismissed
/disposed.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)
avk 2/2
Dhanaji Sapan Barve
Sopan Laxman Bhujbal and Ors.
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court