The Bombay High Court disposed of three execution applications (Nos. 693, 698, and 700 of 2017) filed by the applicant as withdrawn upon the applicant seeking permission to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10, 13 & 15_EXA_693_17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 693 OF 2017
Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited … Applicant
vs.
Amita R. Jadhav … Respondent
AND
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 698 OF 2017
Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited … Applicant
vs.
CRP Technologies India Limited and another … Respondents
AND EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 700 OF 2017
Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited …
Applicant
vs.
Sunil K. Dhoble … Respondent
Mr. Vishal Tambat a/w. Ms. Chaitali Bhogle for applicant.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J DATE : 18th JULY, 2023
P.C. :
. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the execution applications.
PRIYA KAMBLI
(MANISH PITALE, J)
Digitally signed by PRIYA KAMBLIDate: 2023.07.20 Priya Kambli 10:41:10 +0530
1/1
Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited
Amita R. Jadhav
CRP Technologies India Limited
Sunil K. Dhoble
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
