Applications were disposed of as infructuous on the submission that the term of elected candidates had expired. No substantive legal principle is articulated as the order contained no reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 7 ep 1.17.odt.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
ELECTION PETITION NO.1 OF 2017
Prashant s/o Pralhadrao Kate
Vs.
Election Commission Of India, New Delhi and ors. WITH
ELECTION PETITION NO.02 OF 2017
Santosh s/o Narayanrao Gawande
Vs.
Election Commission of India, New Delhi & Ors.
_______________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Shri S.R. Narnaware, Advocate for the petitioners.
Shri Harish Vivek Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.4.
CORAM : G.A. SANAP, J. DATE : JUNE 6, 2023.
Learned Advocates for the petitioner and the respondent are present in the Court.
2 7 ep 1.17.odt.
(G. A. SANAP, J.)
manisha
Prashant s/o Pralhadrao Kate
Election Commission of India
G.A. Sanap
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
