Keshavlal Himmatlal Thakkar v. Hansa Bipinkumar Bhiwandiwala and Anr.
Bombay HCCRA/78/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶3
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.78 OF 2022
¶4
| Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
|---|---|
| CORAM :S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL.-II) DATE : 05thJune, 2023 None Present. |
|
| The above numbered Civil Revision | |
| Application is listed on board of Registrar third | |
| time. Already four weeks time has been | |
| granted, however, despite granting four weeks time, the office objections are not removed. |
|
| Here reference to Chapter V of the Bombay | |
| High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 (for short “Rules”) may be conveniently made. It states about procedure after presentation, removal of office objections etc. |
|
| In view of provisions under Chapter V, Rule | |
| 3(ii), the Advocates/Parties are expected to remove office objections within 14 days from |
|
| the date of notification. | |
| Rule (5) further provides that, if the office | |
| objections are not removed as provided under Rule 3, the office shall place the matter before |
|
| the Registrar, who shall refuse the registration of all such matters. |
¶5
| The prescribed time to remove the office objections provided under Rules 1960 has been |
|---|
| expired. 04 weeks time was granted, but all in |
| vain. The matter is lying ideally without any fi |
| progress due to non removal of office |
| fi objections. However, instead of passing order of refusal of registration or dismissal outrightly, it |
| would be just and proper to give one |
| opportunity to remove the office objections. In turn, two weeks time is granted with directions to remove the office objections without fail. On failure, registration would stand refused without further reference to the Court of Registrar. No further extension will be granted. sd/- Registrar (Judl. - II) dsm |
Coram
AI extract
S.R. AGRAWAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court