A commercial contempt petition was disposed of upon the filing and acceptance of consent terms signed by the parties in the underlying summary suit, settling the disputes between them.
The summary suit was disposed of in terms of consent terms accepted by the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901-cpcd-26-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.26 OF 2021 IN
COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO.166 OF 2018
Sunil Gunvantlal Shah & Ors. ...Petitioners Vs. Maninath Impex & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Hkiran Jain a/w. Mr. D. Jain, i/b. Kiran Jain & Co. for Petitioners. Mr. Abhishek Bhat i/b S.K. Legal for Respondent/contemnors 1 & 2. Mr. Sunil Shah, Petitioner No.1 present.
Mr. Vishal S. Shah, Petitioner No.4 present.
Mr. Devichand Fozmal Jain, Defendant No.2 and Proprietor of Defendant No.1 present.
Mr. Paresh Devichand Jain present.
--CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 30th March, 2023
P.C. :
1/2
901-cpcd-26-2021.odt
daughter of Petitioner No.1, however, they are not present in Court. Petitioner No.1 identified their signatures on the Consent Terms.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
A.B.Kakde
2/2
Sunil Gunvantlal Shah
Maninath Impex
Devichand Fozmal Jain
Paresh Devichand Jain
ARIF S. DOCTOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
