In this contempt petition alleging non-compliance with an order in a writ petition, the court noted the Petitioner's submission that the order was largely complied with.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-cp45-22.doc
vai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed VASANT by VASANT ANANDRAO ANANDRAO IDHOL IDHOL Date: 2023.03.10 18:09:34 +0530
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.45 OF 2022 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1651 OF 2019
Sharad M. Keni & Ors. V/s.
Dr.Sanjay Mukherjee & Ors.
...Petitioners
...Respondents
Mr.Sachin S. Punde for the Petitioners.
Mr.Ashutosh M. Kulkarni for the Respondent No.3.
Mr.A.I. Patel, Addl.G.P. with Mrs.M.S. Bane, AGP for the State – Respondent No.5.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA &
GAURI GODSE, JJ. DATE : 6TH MARCH, 2023.
P.C. :-
the order dated 19th March, 2019 passed in Writ Petition No.1651 of 2019. By the said order, the amount of interest computed by the Land
Acquisition Officer was directed to be deposited by CIDCO with the Land Acquisition Officer. Learned counsel for the Petitioner makes a statement that by and large the order under contempt has been complied with. Hence the the Petitioners do not wish to pursue this
1/2
2-cp45-22.doc
Contempt Petition.
(GAURI GODSE, J.) (R.D. DHANUKA, J.)
2/2
R.D. Dhanuka
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
