The single-judge High Court disposed of a contempt petition where the respondent corporation produced bank statements showing payment to the petitioner, leading counsel to seek time before formal withdrawal.
Contempt Petition disposed with liberty to re-agitate grievance regarding receipt or quantum of payments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
kishor 1/2 903 CP 347 of 23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.347 OF 2023
Rajaram Anandrao Kale ...Petitioner Versus Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation & Ors. ...Respondent
Ms. Sheetal Ubale, i/b. Rajaram Bansode for Petitioner. Ms. Gargi Warunjikar, for Respondent.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED : 13 DECEMBER 2023.
P.C. :
When the Contempt Petition was listed on 07 December 2023, following Order was passed :-
kishor 2/2 903 CP 347 of 23.doc
with liberty to the Petitioner to re-agitate any grievance in the event it is found that the amounts are actually not received by him or lesser amount is paid to him.
of.
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Rajaram Anandrao Kale
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
