Petitioners sought contempt for violation of directions in a criminal order, but submitted the underlying dispute was settled, resulting in the contempt petition being dropped.
Contempt petition dropped in the interest of justice as the underlying dispute was settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
KVM
1/1
48 - CP 342 OF 2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
KANCHAN Digitally signed byKANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2023.11.0415:07:38 +0530
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 342 OF 2023
Anisa Imran Jasnaik & Ors. VERSUS
Imran Muraj Jasnaik
….. Petitioners
….. Respondent
Mr.Shreyash S.Butala for the Petitioners.
CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 3rd NOVEMBER, 2023
P.C. :-
Matter is on board and is mentioned out of turn at 10.30 a.m.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Anisa Imran Jasnaik & Ors.
Imran Muraj Jasnaik
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
