The High Court at Bombay Bench Aurangabad disposed of two contempt petitions where the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge found no merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1} CP 143 OF 2023 & ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
966 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.143 OF 2023
IN WP/4889/2022
NEETABAI RAVINDRA CHAUDHARI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SPORTS AND EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AND ORS.
AND
967 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.144 OF 2023 IN WP/5017/2022
KAMINEE RAMSING THOKE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS.
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Paresh B.Patil (Borse) AGP for Respondents-State : Mr.R.V.Dasalkar Advocate for Respondent no.3 : Mr. V.V.Gujar
...
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, JJ.
DATE : 27 April 2023
PER COURT :-
{2} CP 143 OF 2023 & ANR
to pass appropriate order on the proposal seeking grant of approval to the appointments of the petitioners within four weeks.
( ABHAY S. WAGHWASE ) ( MANGESH S. PATIL ) JUDGE JUDGE
SPT
NEETABAI RAVINDRA CHAUDHARI
KAMINEE RAMSING THOKE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
