Govind Baliram Gurav v. Sanjay Kumar through Secretary Home Dept Mumbai and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged delayed pension payment. Respondent deposited cheque. Nothing survives. Contempt petition disposed of.
Petitioner challenged delayed pension payment. Respondent deposited cheque. Nothing survives. Contempt petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
910-CP-133-2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.133 OF 2020
GOVIND BALIRAM GURAV
VERSUS
SANJAY KUMAR THROUGH SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT,
MANTRALAYA MUMBAI AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Vinod D. Godbharle
AGP for Respondent – State : Mr. S. D. Ghayal
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND
ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, JJ.
DATED : 5 APRIL 2023
PER COURT :
Heard learned advocate for both sides.
2.Learned APP tenders across the bar a communication received
from the Superintendent of Police, Latur dated 05.04.2023, mentioning that in
respect interest to be paid for the delayed payment of pensionary benefits as
ordered by this Court in the order (Exh. ‘A’), a cheque for sum of Rs.80,810/-
has been drawn in the name of the petitioner on 14.04.2023 and would be
deposited in his account. A photocopy of the cheque has also been annexed
with this communication. The communication is taken on record. Nothing
survives. Contempt petition is disposed of.
(ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.)
(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
1/1
Tandale/-
GOVIND BALIRAM GURAV
SANJAY KUMAR THROUGH SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, MANTRALAYA MUMBAI AND OTHERS
MANGESH S. PATIL
ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court