Disposed

Pandu Tukaram Dabhade v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC26 Apr 2023CP/117/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of five Contempt Petitions. Leave was granted for filing affidavits by respondents. The Special Land Acquisition Officer was directed to pass a final award within four months. Leave was also granted to amend another contempt petition.

What did the court decide?

Disposed of contempt petitions; directed final award to be passed within four months; leave granted for amendment.

Pandu Tukaram Dabhade Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

915 CP 102 OF 2019+.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

915 CONT. PETITION NO.102 OF 2019

¶4

IN WP/1887/2017 WITH CP/110/2019 IN WP/1689/2017 WITH CP/100/2019 IN WP/1875/2017 WITH CP/109/2019 IN WP/1692/2017 WITH CP/117/2019 IN WP/3728/2016 WITH CP/141/2019 IN WP/2081/2016 WITH CP/236/2017 IN WP/9482/2015

¶5

BAHADURSING DEOCHAND SHIHIRE AND OTHERS

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶8

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Singare Ramdas B. AGP for Respondents/State : Mrs. M.A. Deshpande

¶9

Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 in CP/102/2019 : Mr. S.M. Ganachari Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 in CP/109/2019 : Mr. S.M. Ganachari Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 in CP/110/2019 : Mr. Milind S.

¶10

Mahajan

¶11

Advocate for Respondents Nos. 3 in CP No. 117/2019 : Mr. R.V. Dasalkar Advocate for Respondent No. 2 in CP/236/2017 : Mr. S.S. Tope Advocate Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 in CP/141/2019 : Mr. Vaibhav Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent No. 3 in CP/100/2019 : Mr. Bhushan B. Kulkarni

¶12

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, JJ. DATE : 26.04.2023

¶13

PER COURT :

¶14

Learned advocate for the petitioners seeks time to take appropriate

¶15

steps.

¶16

Learned advocate Mr. Kulkarni for the respondent No. 3 in Contempt Petition No. 100/2019 submits that the original officers who have been named in the Contempt Petitions are no longer serving on that post. However, their successors who are present in the Court are willing to file the affidavits demonstrating steps being taken pursuant to the directions of this Court in the orders of which contempt is being alleged. He submits that the affidavits would be filed in Contempt Petition No. 100/2019. Leave granted.

¶17

1/2

¶18

Learned advocate Mrs. Deshpande submits that she is filing affidavits on behalf of the Special Land Acquisition Officer cum Sub Divisional Officer in Contempt Petition Nos. 102/2019, 109/2019, 110/2019, 117/2019 and 236/2017. Leave granted.

¶19

Even learned advocate Mr. Ganachari who appears for the Zilla Parishad in Contempt Petition nos. 102/2019 and 109/2019 tenders across the Bar affidavit in reply.

¶20

Learned advocate Mr. Dasalkar submits that a similar affidavit on behalf of the Zilla Parishad has been filed in Contempt Petition No. 117/2019.

¶21

Learned advocate Mrs. Deshpande submits that the Special Land Acquisition Officer would pass final award within four months. The statement is accepted as an undertaking to the Court.

¶22

All these five Contempt Petitions (Contempt Petition Nos. 102/2019, 109/2019, 110/2019, 117/2019 and 236/2017) are disposed of with direction to the Special land Acquisition Officer to pass the final award as expeditiously as possible and in any event within four months from today.

¶23

8 Leave granted to amend the Contempt Petition No. 141/2019. Amendment to be carried out within one week.

¶24

Issue simple notice to the party to be added in Contempt Petition No. 141/2019, returnable on 05.07.2023.

¶25

(ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)

¶26

mkd/-

¶27

2/2

Pandu Tukaram Dabhade v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pandu Tukaram Dabhade v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shamsunder S/O. Shankarrao Ningurkar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Deepak Singh Hariendra Nath Singh and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Anita W/O. Rajkumar Sartape and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shamlal Mansing Dahingal and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bahadursing Deochand Shihire and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Gulchand Sandusing Shihire and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others