The High Court of Bombay granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the contempt petition and disposed of the matter as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neeta Sawant 1/1 12-CP-110-2021.doc 28 August 2023.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 110 OF 2021
Mr. Sanjay Raghunath Kshirsagar and Ors. ....Petitioners
V/s.
Smt. Banabai Pandurang Mali and Ors. ....Respondents
Mr. Shantanu Kalekar, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Drupad S. Patil a/w. Mr. Dheeraj Patil, for the Respondents.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Dated : 28 August 2023.
P.C. :
Digitally signed by NEETA NEETA SHAILESH SHAILESH SAWANT SAWANT Date: 2023.08.29 13:08:33 +0530
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Mr. Sanjay Raghunath Kshirsagar and Ors.
Smt. Banabai Pandurang Mali and Ors.
SANDEEP V. MARNE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
