A single-judge bench allowed the withdrawal of a contempt petition filed under a writ petition, without making any observations on the merits.
Withdrawal of the present petition allowed with liberty and disposed of accordingly without observations on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-AS:37682
501-conp-3-23.doc
Darshan Patil
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 3 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1078 OF 2020 WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 1067 OF 2020
SANDEEP VASUDEV SWAMY AND ANR. ..PETITIONERS
VS.
MANJULA SANDEEP SWAMY AND ANR. ..RESPONDENTS
Adv. Jeetendra Rajguru for the Petitioners.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : DECEMBER 14, 2023
P.C. :
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to
withdraw the present petition with liberty to file an appropriate proceeding before this Court or any other forum.
3. The present petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty and disposed of accordingly.
4. It is made clear that I have not made any observations on the merits of the matter.
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
1/1
Sandeep Vasudev Swamy And Anr.
Manjula Sandeep Swamy And Anr.
Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
