Appeal dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement in underlying suit. Interim application disposed of as nothing survives.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; Interim Application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 29-COMAO-15-2022.doc
Digitally signed by WAKLE WAKLE MANOJ MANOJ JANARDHAN JANARDHAN Date: 2023.09.07 17:45:53 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.15 OF 2022
Shri Swapnil Vinod Baphana alias Swapnil Vinod Jain & Ors. : Appellants Vs. M/s. S.S. Agencies & Ors. : Respondents
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.18812 OF 2022 IN COMMERCIAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.15 OF 2022
Mr. Shriram S. Kulkarni for Appellants.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 5th September, 2023
P.C. :
Mr. Kulkarni learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the Appellants today tendered a copy of the Order passed in Commercial Suit No.2 of 2020 and pointed out that parties to the said Suit had arrived at a settlement, basis which, the said Suit was dismissed as withdrawn. He therefore submitted that nothing thus survive in the present Appeal and sought leave to withdraw the same.
1 of 2
Manoj
2 29-COMAO-15-2022.doc
withdrawn, in view of the Order passed in Commercial Suit No.2 of 2020, a copy of which is taken on record.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
2 of 2
Manoj
Shri Swapnil Vinod Baphana alias Swapnil Vinod Jain & Ors.
M/s. S.S. Agencies & Ors.
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA
ARIF S. DOCTOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
