Allowed

Mr. Kallapa Sidram Chougule v. Sou. Subhadra Rautraya Patil and Ors.

Bombay HC1 Mar 2023CAF/165/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed civil applications seeking restoration of first appeals dismissed for non-removal of office objections. The applicants were directed to remove objections within eight weeks or face revival of the original dismissal orders.

What did the court decide?

Civil applications allowed; applicants directed to remove office objections within eight weeks.

Mr. Kallapa Sidram Chougule Vs Sou. Subhadra… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

43-caf162-2016.doc

¶2

VRJ

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.162 OF 2016

¶5

¶6

FIRST APPEAL NO.1219 OF 2015

¶7

Laxmi Shrinivas Kompelli … Applicant V/s. Bhimsha K. Chougule (Deceased) & Ors. … Respondents

¶8

WITH

¶9

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.165 OF 2016

¶10

¶11

FIRST APPEAL NO.1220 OF 2015

¶12

Kallapa Sidram Chougule … Applicant

¶13

V/s.

¶14

Subhadra Rautraya Patil & Ors. … Respondents

¶15

WITH

¶16

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2335 OF 2014

¶17

¶18

FIRST APPEAL NO.1219 OF 2015

¶19

Laxmi Shrinivas Kompelli … Applicant V/s. Bhimsha Kallappa Chougule (Deceased)Thr. LRS. Parvati Bhimsha Chougule (Deceased) & Ors. … Respondents

¶20

WITH

¶21

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.164 OF 2016

¶22

¶23

FIRST APPEAL NO.1219 OF 2015

¶24

¶25

43-caf162-2016.doc

¶26

Laxmi Shrinivas Kompelli … Applicant V/s. Bhimsha K. Chougule (Deceased) & Ors. … Respondents

¶27

Mr. Pravin Sabban with Ms. Arundhati Sabban i/by Dr. Ramdas P. Sabban for the applicants.

¶28

CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : MARCH 1, 2023

¶29

P.C.:

¶30

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.162 OF 2016

¶31

1. The civil application is for restoration of first appeal which was dismissed for non-removal of office objections.

¶32

2. For the reasons stated therein, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).

¶33

3. The applicant shall remove office objections within eight (8) weeks from today. On failure thereof order dated 24^th July 2015 shall revive.

¶34

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.165 OF 2016

¶35

4. The civil application is for restoration of first appeal which was dismissed for non-removal of office objections.

¶36

5. For the reasons stated therein, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).

¶37

6. The applicant to remove office objections within eight (8)

¶38

¶39

43-caf162-2016.doc

¶40

weeks from today. If the applicant fails to remove office objections within eight (8) weeks from today, the order dated 24^th July 2015 shall revive.

¶41

(AMIT BORKAR, J.)

¶42

Mr. Kallapa Sidram Chougule v. Sou. Subhadra Rautraya Patil and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Kallapa Sidram Chougule v. Sou. Subhadra Rautraya Patil and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandeep P Shah and Anr. Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors.

Lalachand Pancham Pal Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Sandeep P Shah and Anr. Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors.

Shri Vikas Dyandeo Dhumal (Lrs of Shantabai Dyandeo Dhumal)and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shri. Ashok Bhagawan Khendad(Lrs of Sou. Chandrabhagabai Bhagwan Khendad) Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Prabha Narendra Guri and Ors. Vs Smt. Nirmala Trikamdas Guri and Ors.