Allowed

Smt.Vijaya Vidhyadhar Pathak and Anr. v. the New India Assurance Company Limited

Bombay HC16 Feb 2023CAF/158/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the civil application in a first appeal regarding an accident compensation claim. The court permitted applicants to withdraw 50% of the deposited amount with accrued interest upon furnishing an undertaking, given the deceased was the sole income earner and applicant No.1 requires funds for medical expenses due to cancer. Arguments regarding negligence were reserved for the f

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; applicants permitted to withdraw 50% of deposited amount with accrued interest on furnishing undertaking.

Smt.Vijaya Vidhyadhar Pathak and Anr. Vs the New India Assurance Company Limited — Bombay HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

67-caf-158-2022.doc

¶2

Shubhada S Kadam

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 158 OF 2022

¶5

¶6

FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 35652 OF 2015

¶7

Vijaya Vidhyadhar Pathak & anr. ….Applicants In the matter of The New India Assurance Company Ltd. ….Appellant Versus Vijaya Vidhyadhar Pathak & Ors. ….Respondents

¶8

Ms. Riddhi Gurav i/b. Mr. Sandip D Shinde, Advocate for the Applicant.

¶9

Mr. S. M. Dange, Advocate for the Appellant-Insurance Company.

¶10

CORAM : S. G. DIGE, J.

¶11

DATE : 16th FEBRUARY 2023.

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for the respondent-Insurance Company.

¶14

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the deceased was the only earning member of the applicants’ family and

¶15

the applicants have no source of income. They are facing starvation, they need the amount for their daily expenses. Learned

¶16

1/3

¶17

Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2023.02.20 14:54:29 +0530

¶18

SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM

¶19

67-caf-158-2022.doc

¶20

Shubhada S Kadam

¶21

counsel further submits that applicant No.1 is suffering from cancer, she needs the amount for her medical expenses. The accident is of the year 2010, since then, the applicants have not received any compensation. Hence, requested to allow the application.

¶22

Learned counsel for the respondent-Insurance Company strongly objected to allow the application on the ground that the accident had occurred due to sole negligence of the deceased. The Tribunal has considered the income of the deceased on the higher side and has awarded exorbitant and excessive compensation. Hence, requested to dismiss the application.

¶23

I have heard both learned counsel. The accident had occurred in the year 2010, since then, the applicants have not received any compensation. The deceased was the Karta of the applicants’ family. Applicant No.1 is suffering from cancer. She has no source of income, she needs the amount for her daily and medical expenses. The grounds raised by learned counsel for respondent-Insurance Company can be considered at the time of final hearing of the appeal. Hence, I pass the following order :

¶24

2/3

¶25

67-caf-158-2022.doc

¶26

Shubhada S Kadam

¶27

The application is allowed.

¶28

The applicants are permitted to withdraw 50% amount along with the accrued interest thereon, out of the deposited amount, on furnishing undertaking.

¶29

The application stands disposed of.

¶30

(S. G. DIGE, J.)

¶31

3/3

Smt.Vijaya Vidhyadhar Pathak and Anr. v. the New India Assurance Company Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt.Vijaya Vidhyadhar Pathak and Anr. v. the New India Assurance Company Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Danesh Aspandiar Irani Vs Afzal Abdul Sattar and Ors.

Shri. Vilas Anna Doiphode Deceaed through HEIRS.1-A)SOU. Shanta Vilas Doiphode and Ors. Vs Shri. Anna Bhimpappa Ambi and Ors.

Smt Krishnabai Dnyaneshwar Ingawale and Ors. Vs the New India Assurance Co. Ltd.,Pune and Anr.

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Shri. Sandip Rameshlal Basrani and Anr.

Reliance General Insurance Company Limited Vs Smt. Divya Deepak Kamble and Ors.

Reliance General Insurance Company Limited Vs Sandesh Shivram Kadam and Others