Partly allowed

Maya Gopal Sable v. Gopal Haridas Sable

Bombay HC18 Aug 2023CA/7175/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses an objection to condoning the 109-day delay in filing a family appeal, mandates the appeal's registration, and directs the initiation of mediation through a designated advocate to explore marital reconciliation while maintaining an interim restraint on second marriages.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 109 days condoned; family appeal registered; mediation initiated with Smt. S.T. Kazi; interim order against second marriage continued.

Maya Gopal Sable Vs Gopal Haridas Sable — Matrimonial and Divorce | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

( 1 )

¶2

916 ca 7175.23

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

916 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.7175 OF 2023

¶5

IN FCAST/14436/2023 WITH CA/8990/2023 IN FCAST/14436/2023

¶6

MAYA GOPAL SABLE

¶7

VERSUS
GOPAL HARIDAS SABLE

¶8

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Tapse Ashok Ramdhan
Advocate for Respondents : Ms. More Shubhangi D.

¶9

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE :18th August, 2023

¶10

P.C. :-

¶11

1. Delay of 109 days is caused in filing the Family Court Appeal.

¶12

2. We have considered the submissions of the learned advocates for

¶13

the respective sides. The learned advocate for the Respondent has vehemently
opposed the application for condonation of delay and prays that the same may
be dismissed by imposing cost of Rupees One Lakh.

¶14

3. The delay is not too long and does not appear to be deliberate. As

¶15

such, for the reasons set out in the application, the same is allowed. The delay
of 109 days is condoned.

¶16

4.The Family Court Appeal be registered.

¶17

( 2 ) 916 ca 7175.23

¶18

5.The learned advocate for the Appellant submits that she desires to
undergo a round of mediation at the High Court level with an attempt to save
her marriage. The learned advocate for the Respondent submits that the
mediation may be caused to find out whether a solution to the marital discord
could be explored. Both suggest the name of learned advocate Smt. S.T. Kazi.

¶19

6.In view of the above, office to process the papers so as to be
delivered to Mrs. Kazi. The learned advocates are at liberty to contact the
learned Mediator for an early initiation of the mediation proceedings. Liberty
to circulate the Family Court Appeal after the mediation proceedings are
concluded.

¶20

7.Until further orders, the interim order preventing the parties from
performing a second marriage, would continue.

¶21

 [Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.][RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.]

¶22

mub

Maya Gopal Sable v. Gopal Haridas Sable

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maya Gopal Sable v. Gopal Haridas Sable

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Govind Dadarao Pawar and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others

Valmik Rajaram Garudkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Maroti Bala Pawar Died through Lrs Kadubal Alias Kishor Maroti Pawar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Others

Kiran Kashinath Avhad Vs the State of through Its Principal Secretary and Others

Baburao Nagorao Gadade and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Jaiprakash Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. Thr Its Branch Manager and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others