Disposed

The State of Mah v. Jamal Mohamed Shaikh and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Dec 2023CA/6774/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Lok Adalat disposed of several first appeals in land acquisition cases. The State sought withdrawal based on a Government Resolution covering the matters. The Court condoned delay, registered the appeals, dismissed them as withdrawn, and granted the State six months to deposit compensation for claimants to potentially withdraw.

What did the court decide?

Appeals withdrawn; delay condoned; claimants granted liberty to withdraw claims upon State depositing compensation within six months.

The State of Mah Vs Jamal Mohamed Shaikh and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

2023:BHC-AUG:26446

¶2

72Ahmednagar

¶3

IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILESH P. BRAHME
HELD ON 9TH DECEMBER, 2023.

¶4

AT THE HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE, AURANGABAD

¶5

72 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6770 OF 2012 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.14015/2012

¶6

WITH

¶7

FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.14015/2012

¶8

AND

¶9

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6774/2012 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.14009/2012

¶10

WITH
FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.14009/2012

¶11

AND

¶12

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6776/2012 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.14018/2012

¶13

 WITH
FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.14018/2012

¶14

AND

¶15

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6772/2012 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.14021/2012
WITH
FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO.14021/2012

¶16

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶17

VERSUS

¶18

BALA LAXMAN DHARAM AND OTHERS

¶19

Mr. S. M. Ganachari, AGP, Advocate for Appellants/State
Mr. Gangaram Talpade, Deputy Collector (EGS), Ahmednagar, for Acquiring Body.

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

The learned AGP Shri S.M. Ganachari for the State and Mr. Gangaram Talpade, Deputy Collector (EGS), Ahmednagar, for the Acquiring Body, are present today before the Lok Adalat.

¶22

On instructions, the learned AGP submits that these appeals are covered by the Government Resolution dated 03.11.2016 read with subsequent corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018. The learned AGP seeks permission to withdraw the appeals in view of the said Government Resolution/Policy.

¶23

Page 1 of 2

¶24

72Ahmednagar

¶25

As the matters are covered by the Government Resolution/Policy and can be permitted to withdraw, it is desirable to condone the delay. For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay is condoned. The office is directed to register the first appeals.

¶26

In view of the statement of the learned AGP on instructions, the first appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.

¶27

The learned AGP seeks time to deposit the amount of compensation before the Reference Court. Period of six months is granted to deposit the amount before the Reference Court. On depositing the amount, the Respondents/claimants shall be at liberty to withdraw the same alongwith interest.

¶28

Court fees be refunded as per Rules.

¶29

Award be drawn accordingly.

¶30

8. Pending Civil Applications also stand disposed of.

¶31

(A. R. BORULKAR)(S. G. SHETE )( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. )
AdvocateDistrict Judge Head of the Panel
Member(Retd.)
Member

¶32

Date: 09.12.2023

¶33

Place: Aurangabad

¶34

JPChavan

¶35

Page 2 of 2

The State of Mah v. Jamal Mohamed Shaikh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Mah v. Jamal Mohamed Shaikh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Savita Hemraj More and Ors. vs Dipesh Pradip Patil and Ors.

Ramchandra Nilu Kadam vs the State of Maharashtra through the Collector Jalna and Ors.

Laxman Nilu Kadam vs the State of Maharashtra through the Collector, Jalna and Ors.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Vs Devidas Madhav Ingale

The State of Maharashtra Vs Ram Sambhaji Bhosale

The State of Mah and Anr. Vs Shrikant Bansilal Mandore and Anr.