Disposed

Baburao Shankarrao Jadhav v. Grampanchyat Kendra(Kh) Sengaon Thru Secretary and Anr.

Bombay HC7 Jan 2023CA/6171/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad disposed of a second appeal and an accompanying civil application regarding a property dispute. The court maintained the status quo for the suit property during the appeal's pendency without deciding the substantive appeal.

What did the court decide?

Directed both parties to maintain status quo regarding the suit property during the pendency of the second appeal.

Baburao Shankarrao Jadhav Vs Grampanchyat Kendra(Kh)… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

35-SA-302.2012

¶2

SGA

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

SECOND APPEAL NO.302 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6171 OF 2012

¶5

Baburao Shankarrao Jadhav

¶6

… Appellant

¶7

Versus

¶8

Gram Panchayat Kendra (Kh) and another

¶9

… Respondents

¶10

Mr.Sachin S. Deshmukh– Advocate for Appellant Mr.K.N. Lokhande – Advocate for respondent nos.1 & 2.

¶11

CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 7^th January, 2023

¶12

PER COURT :

¶13

Second Appeal No.302 of 2012 :-

¶14

This appeal is filed by the original plaintiff. Trial Court decreed the suit and declared that notices dated 2^nd March, 2004 and 17^th March, 2004 issued by the respondents are illegal and the respondents were restrained from dismantling the house of the appellant. The said decree by the trial Court is reversed by the appeal Court and suit filed by the appellant is dismissed.

¶15

I have heard both learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶16

1/3

¶17

35-SA-302.2012

¶18

Second appeal raises substantial questions of law as formulated by the appellant in ground nos.III and IV of the appeal memo. Hence, the second appeal is admitted on substantial questions of law formulated in the said grounds, which are reproduced below :-

¶19

“III) Whether the First Appellate Court is justified in overlooking the authority of the respondent in respect of effecting correction in the village record, admittedly when the Form 8 was issued in favour of the appellant declaring the appellant as a owner of House No.194 admeasuring 418 Sq. ft.

¶20

IV) Whether the First Appellate Court is justified in overlooking the authority of the respondents to issue impugned notice, when the respondents themselves have given a declaration that, the appellant is owner of House No.194 and possesses the area in the light of said declaration, whether the respondents can appropriate and reprobate, while issuing the impugned notice.”

¶21

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents waive service.

¶22

Call record and proceedings.

¶23

Printing dispensed with

¶24

Appellant to file private paper book containing judgments of both the courts, first appeal memo, pleadings, notes of evidence and

¶25

2/3

¶26

35-SA-302.2012

¶27

exhibited documents, within a period of six months from today.

¶28

Civil Application no.6171 of 2012 :-

¶29

By order dated 5^th September, 2012, there is already order passed directing the respondents to maintain status-quo as on that date.

¶30

The challenge in the suit was with respect to the notices dated 2^nd March, 2004 and 17^th March, 2004 issued by the Gram Panchayat for removal of the encroachment. If during pendency of the second appeal, notices are implemented, then the second appeal itself would become infructuous. Since the filing of the suit, the suit property is protected by way of interim relief, the protection needs to be continued during the pendency of second appeal. It will be appropriate that even the appellant maintains status-quo with respect to the suit property and not change nature of the suit property and/or create any third party interest in the suit property during pendency of the second appeal. Hence, during pendency of the second appeal, both the parties shall maintain status-quo with respect to the suit property.

¶31

3 Civil application is disposed of.

¶32

[ GAURI GODSE, J. ]

¶33

3/3

Baburao Shankarrao Jadhav v. Grampanchyat Kendra(Kh) Sengaon Thru Secretary and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baburao Shankarrao Jadhav v. Grampanchyat Kendra(Kh) Sengaon Thru Secretary and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Somnath Namdeo Nagare Vs Manda Baban Ghuge and Others

Somnath Namdeo Nagare Vs Manda Baban Ghuge and Others

Jaydeep Shivaji Mate Vs Elanco India Pvt. Ltd. through Its Managing Director

Nagnath Tukaram Bilapatte Dead Lrs. Ramchandra and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra Thro. the District Colltctor Latur and Ors.

Sudhir Hanmantrao Deshmukh Vs Viswasmbharrao Kishanrao Deshmukh Died Thr Lrs Thakur Shridhar Viswambharrao Desumukh and Ors.

Sudhir Hanmantrao Deshmukh Vs Viswasmbharrao Kishanrao Deshmukh Died Thr Lrs Thakur Shridhar Viswambharrao Desumukh and Ors.