In this appeal against a judgment denying restitution of conjugal rights, the court issued notice to respondents for returnable date 04.09.2023 and disposed of the civil application for stay as no interim relief was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
913-FCA-36-2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.36 OF 2023
WITH CA/4759/2023 IN FCA/36/2023
DEEPAK DNYANESHWAR SHINDE
VERSUS
MOHINI DEEPAK SHINDE
Mr. Mangesh G. Patil, Advocate for Appellant
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE:01.08.2023
PER COURT :-
1.The Appellant/husband is aggrieved by the impugned
judgment, by which he is denied restitution of conjugal rights.
2.Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on
04.09.2023.
3.Since the Appellant is not granted the relief of
restitution of conjugal rights by the impugned judgment, there is
no question of granting interim relief. Hence, the Civil Application
praying for staying of the impugned order, would not survive and
stands disposed off.
[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ]
SMS
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against denial of restitution of conjugal rights should be allowed.
DEEPAK DNYANESHWAR SHINDE
MOHINI DEEPAK SHINDE
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court