In a civil application regarding the registration of a Second Appeal, the single-judge bench allowed it after finding the delay non-malafide and satisfactory, noting the respondents' non-appearance.
Civil Application allowed; Second Appeal to be registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
58-CA-2766-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2766 OF 2014
IN SAST/3764/2014
SHRIPATI TULSHIRAM HADULE VERSUS NAMDEO GOPAL KORE AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. A.S. Kulkarni h/f. Mr. Natu Sharad V.
CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 10th March, 2023
PER COURT :
1/2
58-CA-2766-2014
SPChauhan
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in preferring the Second Appeal was bona fide and satisfactorily explained.
Shripati Tulshiram Hadule
Namdeo Gopal Kore
R.M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
