In a Family Court Appeal, the appellant prayed for stay and quashing of interim maintenance orders. The court noted the challenge was an interlocutory order, permitted withdrawal with liberty to seek alternative remedy, and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Ten session was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to claim appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 934.FCA-85-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.85 OF 2023
WITH CA/12075/2023 IN FCA/85/2023
VAIBHAV SUKRAM CHAUDHARI
VERSUS
JYOTI SURESH CHAUDHARI
Appellant : Party in Person
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL &
SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.
DATE : 4 OCTOBER 2023
PER COURT :
Heard.
1. The appellant who appears in person is coming with the following
prayers :
2
934.FCA-85-2023.doc
Any other such order that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit.
2. We have heard appellant in person. When it was indicated that the challenge being put up by him to the order of interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act passed by the Family Court would be an interlocutory order in the light of decision of this Court in the matter of Sunil Hansraj Gupta Vs. Payal Sunil Gupta, 1991 (1) Mh.Lj 737, he seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to avail of the appropriate remedy as is available to him in law.
3. The family court appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Civil application is disposed of.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J.]Najee b .
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to stay, quash, or reduce interim maintenance proceedings under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sunil Hansraj Gupta Vs. Payal Sunil GuptaReferred¶22
Sunil Hansraj Gupta Vs. Payal Sunil Gupta, 1991 (1) Mh.Lj 737 · Who else cites this
Vaibhav Sukram Chaudhari
Jyoti Suresh Chaudhari
Mangesh S. Patil
Shailesh P. Brahme
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court